back to Home page | back to Analyses page | Data quality |
Demographics | Physical health | Hearing | Cognition | Mobility and balance | Quality of life | Mental health | Social participation and support | Views on hearing loss | back to Analyses page
Adopter = anybody who acquired hearing aids in Study 1 or Study
2
NonAdopter = one or both ears with ≥35 dB HL at 2kHz, but did not
acquire hearing aids at any point
GoodAudio = not a candidate by the above criterion, and did not acquire
hearing aids
(Miss = 79 participants without audiograms)
## Tinnitus %
## 1 Yes 42.9
## 2 No 57.1
## 3 Don't know 0.0
## 4 <NA> 0.0
## When experienced %
## 1 Last 7d 100
## 2 8d to 1 mo 0
## 3 1-6 mo 0
## 4 6-12 mo 0
## 5 1 yr+ 0
## 6 <NA> 0
## Bother %
## 1 Yes 100
## 2 No 0
## 3 <NA> 0
## More than 5min %
## 1 All/Most 55.6
## 2 A lot 22.2
## 3 Some 22.2
## 4 Not past year 0.0
## 5 Never 0.0
## 6 <NA> 0.0
## Annoy %
## 1 Severely 22.2
## 2 Moderately 55.6
## 3 Slightly 22.2
## 4 Not at all 0.0
## 5 Do not know 0.0
## 6 <NA> 0.0
With 18 variables, hearing aid candidates are more likely to be
adopters if they:
• have less trouble understanding speech in noise (SSQ speech; 5.8 vs
7.2)
• have enough money (3.8 vs 4.4)
• are lonely (?; 21% vs 20%)
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = m_H_formula, family = "binomial", data = compdata_H)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -8.4191172 3.9355229 -2.139 0.03241 *
## PTA4_better_ear 0.0114398 0.0273469 0.418 0.67571
## PTA4_asym -0.0020966 0.0123219 -0.170 0.86489
## SSQ15i_speech 0.3255000 0.1201267 2.710 0.00674 **
## vision_difficulty 1.2322819 1.4043148 0.877 0.38022
## Age -0.0012309 0.0303521 -0.041 0.96765
## Gender_rec 0.2916073 0.4234116 0.689 0.49101
## Enough_money 0.6754111 0.2476750 2.727 0.00639 **
## Multimorbidity_score -0.0008385 0.1021293 -0.008 0.99345
## CSRQ_mean 0.6981725 0.6297619 1.109 0.26759
## positive_SCI 0.4764146 0.7174033 0.664 0.50664
## Transport_satisfaction -0.1709133 0.3776663 -0.453 0.65087
## Retired 0.1284209 0.4491532 0.286 0.77494
## Lives_alone -0.6942894 0.5233470 -1.327 0.18463
## Lonely 1.3191850 0.6401747 2.061 0.03934 *
## Soc_support 0.4448972 0.2894422 1.537 0.12427
## Social_network_index 0.0085179 0.1680848 0.051 0.95958
## Soc_participation_freq 0.0770030 0.3189430 0.241 0.80922
## Soc_participation_types 0.0503068 0.1546232 0.325 0.74492
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 210.30 on 151 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 172.52 on 133 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 210.52
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
After variable selection, hearing aid candidates are more likely to
be adopters if they (strongest to weakest):
• have less trouble understanding speech in noise
• have enough money
• have more social support (3.8 vs 4.2)
• do not live alone (38% vs 22%)
• are lonely (?; 21% vs 20%)
## 19 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -2.0624495826
## PTA4_better_ear .
## PTA4_asym .
## SSQ15i_speech 0.1516543846
## vision_difficulty .
## Age .
## Gender_rec .
## Enough_money 0.2327094095
## Multimorbidity_score .
## CSRQ_mean .
## positive_SCI .
## Transport_satisfaction .
## Retired .
## Lives_alone -0.1047650940
## Lonely 0.0002373026
## Soc_support 0.0588255448
## Social_network_index .
## Soc_participation_freq .
## Soc_participation_types .
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = HA_3groups_bin ~ SSQ15i_speech + Enough_money +
## Soc_support + Lives_alone + Lonely, family = "binomial",
## data = compdata_H)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -5.75160 1.47040 -3.912 0.0000917 ***
## SSQ15i_speech 0.25956 0.09515 2.728 0.00637 **
## Enough_money 0.57865 0.22482 2.574 0.01006 *
## Soc_support 0.40360 0.24311 1.660 0.09688 .
## Lives_alone -0.66554 0.43435 -1.532 0.12546
## Lonely 1.52787 0.60047 2.544 0.01095 *
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 210.30 on 151 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 179.06 on 146 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 191.06
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
## OddsRatio 2.5 % 97.5 %
## (Intercept) 0.003 0.000 0.049
## SSQ15i_speech 1.296 1.082 1.574
## Enough_money 1.784 1.168 2.834
## Soc_support 1.497 0.937 2.445
## Lives_alone 0.514 0.216 1.198
## Lonely 4.608 1.494 16.015
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_H$SSQ15i_speech[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_H$SSQ15i_speech[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -3.9024, df = 138.8, p-value = 0.0001479
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -2.0361774 -0.6667254
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 5.840486 7.191937
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_H$Enough_money[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_H$Enough_money[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -3.5136, df = 115.96, p-value = 0.0006312
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.9230163 -0.2575392
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 3.847222 4.437500
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_H$Soc_support[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_H$Soc_support[compdata_H$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -2.7101, df = 143.09, p-value = 0.007549
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.7094763 -0.1110241
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 3.754224 4.164474
## HA status
## Lives alone 0 1
## 0 0.62 0.78
## 1 0.38 0.22
## HA status
## Lonely 0 1
## 0 0.79 0.80
## 1 0.21 0.20
## SSQ15i_speech Enough_money Soc_support Lives_alone Lonely
## SSQ15i_speech 1.00000000 0.3587696 0.2859496 -0.07128603 -0.1983232
## Enough_money 0.35876958 1.0000000 0.3425154 -0.20817218 -0.4043249
## Soc_support 0.28594963 0.3425154 1.0000000 -0.32925592 -0.5152061
## Lives_alone -0.07128603 -0.2081722 -0.3292559 1.00000000 0.2797758
## Lonely -0.19832318 -0.4043249 -0.5152061 0.27977582 1.0000000
With 28 variables, hearing aid candidates are more likely to be
adopters if they:
• have enough money (3.9 vs 4.5)
• have better overall SSQ scores (7.3 vs 8.2)
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = m_overall_formula, family = "binomial", data = compdata_overall)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -13.919126 5.323161 -2.615 0.00893 **
## Age 0.030220 0.034697 0.871 0.38377
## Gender_rec 0.106169 0.524109 0.203 0.83947
## Retired -0.194905 0.505288 -0.386 0.69970
## Enough_money 0.907376 0.315973 2.872 0.00408 **
## Multimorbidity_score -0.006235 0.130802 -0.048 0.96198
## Phys_1_rate 0.035571 0.409880 0.087 0.93084
## Mobility_aid 1.165697 1.125284 1.036 0.30024
## ABC_mean 0.006199 0.020824 0.298 0.76593
## vision_disease 0.405663 0.533014 0.761 0.44661
## vision_checkup_past_year 0.528861 0.620567 0.852 0.39409
## PTA4_better_ear -0.012567 0.031303 -0.401 0.68809
## PTA4_asym -0.004119 0.014704 -0.280 0.77937
## Tinnitus_pastwk -0.175543 0.512265 -0.343 0.73184
## SSQ15i_mean 0.518168 0.192686 2.689 0.00716 **
## SIM_mean 0.192089 0.135865 1.414 0.15741
## Emocheq4_mean -0.310866 0.347850 -0.894 0.37149
## HHIES_total 0.068987 0.038142 1.809 0.07050 .
## positive_SCI 0.278664 0.827752 0.337 0.73638
## CSRQ_mean -0.379277 0.728950 -0.520 0.60285
## SWLS_average 0.008303 0.318097 0.026 0.97917
## WHOQOL_overall_qol -0.399958 0.497107 -0.805 0.42107
## WHOQOL_health_qol 0.471260 0.344265 1.369 0.17103
## PHQ4_mean 1.178257 0.619314 1.903 0.05710 .
## Lives_alone -1.069794 0.591661 -1.808 0.07059 .
## Lonely 1.039752 0.804361 1.293 0.19613
## Soc_support 0.385935 0.319945 1.206 0.22772
## Social_network_index -0.055012 0.198118 -0.278 0.78126
## Soc_participation_freq 0.011538 0.356131 0.032 0.97415
## Soc_participation_types 0.005442 0.169579 0.032 0.97440
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 209.32 on 150 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 157.15 on 121 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 217.15
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 5
After variable selection, hearing aid candidates are more likely to
be adopters if they (strongest to weakest):
• have enough money
• have better SSQ overall scores
• do not live alone (?; 36% vs 21%)
• have more depression and anxiety (1.32 vs 1.38)
• have more social support (?; 3.8 vs 4.2)
## 30 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -2.58722078
## Age .
## Gender_rec .
## Retired .
## Enough_money 0.25011635
## Multimorbidity_score .
## Phys_1_rate .
## Mobility_aid .
## ABC_mean .
## vision_disease .
## vision_checkup_past_year .
## PTA4_better_ear .
## PTA4_asym .
## Tinnitus_pastwk .
## SSQ15i_mean 0.17112462
## SIM_mean .
## Emocheq4_mean .
## HHIES_total .
## positive_SCI .
## CSRQ_mean .
## SWLS_average .
## WHOQOL_overall_qol .
## WHOQOL_health_qol .
## PHQ4_mean 0.15229028
## Lives_alone -0.09581825
## Lonely .
## Soc_support 0.01264521
## Social_network_index .
## Soc_participation_freq .
## Soc_participation_types .
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = HA_3groups_bin ~ Enough_money + SSQ15i_mean + Lives_alone +
## PHQ4_mean + Soc_support, family = "binomial", data = compdata_overall)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -9.1160 2.1201 -4.300 0.0000171 ***
## Enough_money 0.7059 0.2442 2.891 0.00384 **
## SSQ15i_mean 0.3790 0.1341 2.827 0.00470 **
## Lives_alone -0.5265 0.4317 -1.220 0.22257
## PHQ4_mean 1.3938 0.4388 3.177 0.00149 **
## Soc_support 0.3668 0.2507 1.463 0.14343
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 209.32 on 150 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 176.03 on 145 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 188.03
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
## OddsRatio 2.5 % 97.5 %
## (Intercept) 0.000 0.000 0.005
## Enough_money 2.026 1.290 3.372
## SSQ15i_mean 1.461 1.136 1.927
## Lives_alone 0.591 0.250 1.375
## PHQ4_mean 4.030 1.812 10.280
## Soc_support 1.443 0.889 2.390
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_overall$Enough_money[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_overall$Enough_money[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -3.3671, df = 121.29, p-value = 0.001018
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.9009573 -0.2337795
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 3.880000 4.447368
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_overall$SSQ15i_mean[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_overall$SSQ15i_mean[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -3.511, df = 144.11, p-value = 0.0005963
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -1.451236 -0.405796
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 7.263076 8.191591
## HA status
## Lives alone 0 1
## 0 0.64 0.79
## 1 0.36 0.21
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_overall$PHQ4_mean[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_overall$PHQ4_mean[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -0.62456, df = 146.82, p-value = 0.5332
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.2566122 0.1333666
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 1.316667 1.378289
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_overall$Soc_support[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_overall$Soc_support[compdata_overall$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -2.2992, df = 147.47, p-value = 0.0229
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.6210994 -0.0469318
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 3.837037 4.171053
## SSQ15i_mean Enough_money PHQ4_mean
## SSQ15i_mean 1.0000000 0.3404242 -0.3198594
## Enough_money 0.3404242 1.0000000 -0.4404102
## PHQ4_mean -0.3198594 -0.4404102 1.0000000
Using subscales for SSQ and HHIE and subdomains for WHOQOL (single
“Enough money” variable is part of environment domain), 33 variables
showed that hearing aid candidates are more likely be adopters if
they:
• have better WHOQOL psychological health (14.4 vs 14.9)
• have more depression and anxiety (1.32 vs 1.38)
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = m_sub_formula, family = "binomial", data = compdata_sub)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -15.774893 6.906095 -2.284 0.0224 *
## Age 0.013948 0.040768 0.342 0.7322
## Gender_rec 0.811930 0.599424 1.355 0.1756
## Retired 0.140757 0.539169 0.261 0.7940
## Multimorbidity_score 0.058502 0.150165 0.390 0.6968
## Phys_1_rate 0.432533 0.398489 1.085 0.2777
## Mobility_aid 0.300522 1.233372 0.244 0.8075
## ABC_mean -0.026655 0.030608 -0.871 0.3838
## vision_disease 0.165109 0.576711 0.286 0.7747
## vision_checkup_past_year 0.620789 0.640352 0.969 0.3323
## PTA4_better_ear 0.007056 0.035076 0.201 0.8406
## PTA4_asym -0.008512 0.015601 -0.546 0.5854
## Tinnitus_pastwk 0.156799 0.543571 0.288 0.7730
## SSQ15i_speech 0.284088 0.164056 1.732 0.0833 .
## SSQ15i_spatial -0.024101 0.167618 -0.144 0.8857
## SSQ15i_qualities 0.226891 0.186377 1.217 0.2235
## SIM_mean 0.209284 0.143887 1.455 0.1458
## Emocheq4_mean -0.254784 0.375742 -0.678 0.4977
## HHIES_emo 0.112356 0.088514 1.269 0.2043
## HHIES_soc -0.071704 0.098907 -0.725 0.4685
## positive_SCI 0.786191 1.020247 0.771 0.4410
## CSRQ_mean -0.085139 0.784732 -0.108 0.9136
## SWLS_average 0.123467 0.339592 0.364 0.7162
## WHOQOL_dom1_phys -0.067829 0.183375 -0.370 0.7115
## WHOQOL_dom2_psy 0.515057 0.236383 2.179 0.0293 *
## WHOQOL_dom3_soc -0.025724 0.130453 -0.197 0.8437
## WHOQOL_dom4_env 0.130421 0.206014 0.633 0.5267
## PHQ4_mean 1.339276 0.681118 1.966 0.0493 *
## Lives_alone -0.900166 0.619026 -1.454 0.1459
## Lonely 1.119980 0.843418 1.328 0.1842
## Soc_support 0.306729 0.395660 0.775 0.4382
## Social_network_index -0.143090 0.200287 -0.714 0.4750
## Soc_participation_freq -0.476375 0.379502 -1.255 0.2094
## Soc_participation_types 0.268537 0.195701 1.372 0.1700
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 193.05 on 139 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 144.55 on 106 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 212.55
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 5
With variable selection, hearing aid candidates are more likely to be
adopters if they (strongest to weakest):
• have better SSQ speech scores (?; 5.9 vs 7.2)
• have better SSQ qualities scores (?; 8.1 vs 8.9)
• have better SSQ spatial scores (?; 7.5 vs 8.5)
• have more social support (?; 3.8 vs 4.2)
• do not live alone (?; 21% vs 34%)
• have more depression and anxiety
## 34 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -1.303066010
## Age .
## Gender_rec .
## Retired .
## Multimorbidity_score .
## Phys_1_rate .
## Mobility_aid .
## ABC_mean .
## vision_disease .
## vision_checkup_past_year .
## PTA4_better_ear .
## PTA4_asym .
## Tinnitus_pastwk .
## SSQ15i_speech 0.109626999
## SSQ15i_spatial 0.011012347
## SSQ15i_qualities 0.059434610
## SIM_mean .
## Emocheq4_mean .
## HHIES_emo .
## HHIES_soc .
## positive_SCI .
## CSRQ_mean .
## SWLS_average .
## WHOQOL_dom1_phys .
## WHOQOL_dom2_psy .
## WHOQOL_dom3_soc .
## WHOQOL_dom4_env .
## PHQ4_mean 0.006850211
## Lives_alone -0.051353146
## Lonely .
## Soc_support 0.041222559
## Social_network_index .
## Soc_participation_freq .
## Soc_participation_types .
##
## Call:
## glm(formula = HA_3groups_bin ~ SSQ15i_speech + SSQ15i_spatial +
## SSQ15i_qualities + PHQ4_mean + Lives_alone + Soc_support,
## family = "binomial", data = compdata_sub)
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) -6.63600 1.89200 -3.507 0.000453 ***
## SSQ15i_speech 0.21331 0.11941 1.786 0.074036 .
## SSQ15i_spatial 0.08548 0.13599 0.629 0.529649
## SSQ15i_qualities 0.16836 0.15934 1.057 0.290679
## PHQ4_mean 1.18699 0.45462 2.611 0.009030 **
## Lives_alone -0.59217 0.44558 -1.329 0.183853
## Soc_support 0.46336 0.24858 1.864 0.062315 .
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 193.05 on 139 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 167.73 on 133 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 181.73
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
## OddsRatio 2.5 % 97.5 %
## (Intercept) 0.001 0.000 0.043
## SSQ15i_speech 1.238 0.983 1.575
## SSQ15i_spatial 1.089 0.831 1.427
## SSQ15i_qualities 1.183 0.874 1.675
## PHQ4_mean 3.277 1.455 8.822
## Lives_alone 0.553 0.228 1.322
## Soc_support 1.589 0.986 2.628
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$WHOQOL_dom2_psy[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$WHOQOL_dom2_psy[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -1.7372, df = 132.68, p-value = 0.08468
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -1.1900927 0.0771541
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 14.36458 14.92105
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$PHQ4_mean[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$PHQ4_mean[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -0.61992, df = 137.97, p-value = 0.5363
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.2592684 0.1355019
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 1.316406 1.378289
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$SSQ15i_speech[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$SSQ15i_speech[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -3.3815, df = 121.93, p-value = 0.0009692
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -1.9939967 -0.5214227
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 5.901172 7.158882
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$SSQ15i_spatial[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$SSQ15i_spatial[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -2.9289, df = 124.03, p-value = 0.00405
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -1.6942714 -0.3277928
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 7.510547 8.521579
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$SSQ15i_qualities[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$SSQ15i_qualities[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -2.9448, df = 103.54, p-value = 0.003991
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -1.3894378 -0.2711378
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 8.063594 8.893882
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: compdata_sub$Soc_support[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 0] and compdata_sub$Soc_support[compdata_sub$HA_3groups_bin == 1]
## t = -2.2789, df = 125.61, p-value = 0.02436
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.66873621 -0.04708982
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 3.813140 4.171053
## HA status
## Lives alone 0 1
## 0 0.66 0.79
## 1 0.34 0.21
## WHOQOL_dom2_psy PHQ4_mean SSQ15i_speech SSQ15i_spatial
## WHOQOL_dom2_psy 1.0000000 -0.6874207 0.29659824 0.2177057
## PHQ4_mean -0.6874207 1.0000000 -0.32648728 -0.2994909
## SSQ15i_speech 0.2965982 -0.3264873 1.00000000 0.6547988
## SSQ15i_spatial 0.2177057 -0.2994909 0.65479884 1.0000000
## SSQ15i_qualities 0.2810582 -0.3041049 0.59319931 0.6433211
## Soc_support 0.5350513 -0.4453787 0.29535519 0.2250308
## Lives_alone -0.2095582 0.1607667 -0.06337065 -0.1328644
## SSQ15i_qualities Soc_support Lives_alone
## WHOQOL_dom2_psy 0.28105816 0.5350513 -0.20955820
## PHQ4_mean -0.30410489 -0.4453787 0.16076674
## SSQ15i_speech 0.59319931 0.2953552 -0.06337065
## SSQ15i_spatial 0.64332105 0.2250308 -0.13286440
## SSQ15i_qualities 1.00000000 0.2772565 -0.07062583
## Soc_support 0.27725649 1.0000000 -0.30984586
## Lives_alone -0.07062583 -0.3098459 1.00000000
Social and environmental factors
back to top
Descriptives